news  

Veterans Condemn Governor’s Bridge Plan as Desecration

Veterans Condemn Governor’s Bridge Plan as Desecration

Concerns Over Proposed Bridge Location Near Veteran Memorials

The proposed pedestrian bridge in Denver has sparked significant debate, particularly among veterans’ organizations. Fred Scheck, the state commander of the Colorado Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), has voiced strong opposition to the project, not because he is against the idea of a bridge itself, but due to its planned location. According to Scheck, the bridge would pass through an area that currently houses memorials dedicated to fallen veterans.

“I believe that what he’s doing is totally inappropriate because he’s desecrating memorials dedicated to veterans,” Scheck said. His concerns highlight a growing frustration among local veterans who feel that the proposed location could undermine the significance of these historical sites.

The bridge is part of a larger initiative by the governor’s office to celebrate Colorado’s 150th anniversary in 2026. The project was announced in May and aims to create a more accessible and interactive experience for visitors to the Lincoln Veterans Memorial Park. Governor Jared Polis stated during the announcement:

“When Coloradans of all ages come to visit our state capitol, they can more easily access and enjoy Lincoln Veterans Park while enjoying and learning from art from local artists. This interactive experience will showcase Colorado’s history and look to our even stronger future.”

While the intent behind the project may be positive, Scheck argues that the location is problematic. He questions why the bridge would start near the memorials instead of a different, less sensitive area.

“Why would he want to start that there; isn’t there better places we could start this instead of desecrating our memorials?” Scheck asked. His concern is echoed by other veterans’ groups who believe that the bridge could detract from the solemnity of the site.

The park features various memorials and mementos honoring fallen soldiers and veterans. These landmarks hold deep historical and emotional significance for many residents. Scheck fears that the construction of the bridge could lead to the loss or degradation of these important symbols.

“If they were to do this at the mall in Washington, D.C., at the Korean War Memorial, the Vietnam Memorial, what would people say? So why do we want to do it in the state of Colorado, which is one of the greatest states in this country?” he added.

Despite the concerns raised, the governor’s office has not publicly responded to the criticism from the VFW and other veterans’ organizations. FOX31 reached out for comment but did not receive a reply.

Residents and stakeholders are encouraged to share their opinions on the project. A survey has been made available by the state to gather public input until midnight on July 21. This opportunity allows individuals to express their views and potentially influence the final decision on the bridge’s design and location.

As the debate continues, the question remains: How can the state celebrate its history without compromising the dignity of its memorials? For now, the conversation is ongoing, with many hoping that the final plan will respect both the past and the future of Colorado.