news  

TVS Apache RTR 310 vs Rivals: 2025 Price & Specs Showdown

TVS Apache RTR 310 vs Rivals: 2025 Price & Specs Showdown

Engine and Output Comparison

When it comes to engine specifications, the 2025 TVS Apache RTR 310 stands out with a 312.2cc single-cylinder liquid-cooled engine that delivers 35.6 horsepower at 9,700rpm and 28.7Nm of torque at 6,650rpm. This places it between the Honda CB300R, which has a 286cc engine producing 31 horsepower at 9,000rpm and 27.5Nm of torque at 7,500rpm, and the Triumph Speed 400, which boasts a larger 398cc engine generating 40 horsepower at 8,000rpm and 37.5Nm of torque at 6,500rpm.

In terms of power-to-weight ratio, the Triumph Speed 400 leads with 223hp/tonne, followed closely by the TVS Apache RTR 310 at 210hp/tonne, and the Honda CB300R at 212hp/tonne. The Triumph’s higher displacement and superior torque make it stand out in this category, while the Honda offers a more modest but reliable performance.

Weight and Dimensions Analysis

Looking at weight and dimensions, the Honda CB300R is the lightest at 146kg, making it the most agile option among the three. The TVS Apache RTR 310 weighs 169kg, and the Triumph Speed 400 is the heaviest at 179kg. Despite its weight, the Triumph still manages to offer a better power-to-weight ratio due to its more powerful engine.

In terms of seat height, all three bikes are very similar, ranging from 800mm to 803mm. Ground clearance varies, with the Honda having the lowest at 157mm, while the Triumph doesn’t specify this measurement. The wheelbase for the TVS is 1358mm, slightly longer than the Honda’s 1352mm, and the Triumph’s is 1386mm. Fuel capacity also differs, with the Triumph offering the largest tank at 13 litres, followed by the TVS at 11 litres, and the Honda at 9.7 litres.

Suspension, Brakes, and Tyres Evaluation

All three motorcycles come equipped with disc brakes on both ends, but the Honda CB300R is unique in using organic brake pads, while the TVS and Triumph use sintered pads. The TVS Apache RTR 310 further enhances its braking system with a BTO Dynamic Kit that adds full adjustability for an additional Rs 18,000.

Suspension systems are similar across the board, with all three models featuring upside-down forks and monoshock setups. However, the TVS offers additional customization options through its BTO packages. Tyre sizes are mostly comparable, with slight variations in width and profile. The Triumph uses wider tyres, which could contribute to better grip and stability.

Feature Comparison

The TVS Apache RTR 310 is the only one in this comparison to feature a 5-inch TFT dashboard, along with advanced features like traction control, cruise control, drag torque control, and rear-wheel lift mitigation. It also includes a cooled rider’s seat, though this has been omitted in the latest model. The BTO Dynamic Kit adds fully adjustable suspension and a tyre pressure monitoring system for Rs 18,000, while the Dynamic Pro Kit offers keyless ignition and launch control for Rs 28,000.

The Triumph Speed 400 comes with a digi-analogue instrument cluster and a vertical rev counter, along with traction control and dual-channel ABS. The Honda CB300R, on the other hand, keeps things simple with an LCD dashboard that includes a gear-position indicator and dual-channel ABS, but it lacks traction control, which is available on the CB350 range.

Price and Value Consideration

In terms of pricing, the TVS Apache RTR 310 starts at Rs 2.40 lakh (ex-showroom) and can go up to over Rs 3 lakh when fully loaded with BTO packages. The Honda CB300R is available in a single variant at Rs 2.40 lakh, while the Triumph Speed 400 is priced at Rs 2.46 lakh. The Triumph benefits from its premium brand reputation, which adds to its appeal despite the higher price.

At a similar price point, each bike brings its own unique strengths. The TVS offers a comprehensive list of features, the Honda provides a neo-retro design with a smooth engine, and the Triumph delivers a premium feel with a larger engine and greater output. Each model caters to different preferences, making the choice dependent on the rider’s priorities.