Martin Brundle’s Perspective on Oscar Piastri’s Penalty at the British Grand Prix
Martin Brundle has shared his insights regarding the race-defining penalty that was given to Oscar Piastri during the British Grand Prix. The incident occurred when Piastri, who was leading the race behind a Safety Car, received a 10-second penalty due to his actions. This ultimately resulted in him finishing in second place behind Lando Norris, the race winner.
Piastri later mentioned that he would be banned if he discussed the incident, as he was accused of suddenly slowing down. At the time, he had just taken control of the pack, and it was confirmed that the Safety Car would be coming in at the end of lap 21. Max Verstappen, who managed to pull ahead of Piastri as he struggled to slow down sufficiently, eventually spun while trying to keep up with the accelerating driver from New Zealand. The Dutchman described Piastri’s punishment as “strange.”
Tolong support kita ya,
Cukup klik ini aja: https://indonesiacrowd.com/support-bonus/
Despite this, Brundle understood why the penalty was issued and noted that Red Bull would need mitigating circumstances to avoid it. He also pointed out that a similar incident involving George Russell was overlooked in Canada.
“They need mitigating circumstances to drop that [penalty] to five seconds, or indeed no penalty at all,” Brundle said on Sky Sports F1.
He added, “He was almost stationary, wasn’t he? I hear what Zak [Brown, McLaren CEO] is saying, Max did floor it down the outside to emphasise, but that was extremely slow from Oscar. Yeah, it looked [like he was at a standstill] from our camera angle, but they’ll have that to the nth degree in the data.”
Differing Opinions on the Penalty
Meanwhile, on Channel 4’s coverage, pundit David Coulthard expressed a different view, believing that the punishment was harsh. He explained the rules regarding the Safety Car and how drivers should behave once its lights are off.
Support us — there's a special gift for you.
Click here: https://indonesiacrowd.com/support-bonus/
“When you’re behind the safety car with the lights off, you have to stay within 10 car lengths of that safety car, keeping the field going with you,” Coulthard said. “Once the safety car lights go out, you then control the pace for the restart. You want to allow the safety car to get off into the pit lane. And it’s the fact that he’s accelerated, then decelerated, that’s caught Max out, and then the stewards have either, I assume, used the information that’s available.”
Coulthard continued, “Max has got space, it’s not like he’s on the grass, but that was enough for them to go, that’s erratic behaviour behind the safety car, and that’s why they’ve given the 10-second penalty. Do I think the penalty fits the crime? No. If that’s consistent with things they’ve done in the past, then that should be a smaller penalty.”
He concluded, “He hasn’t forced anyone off the road, seeing it from Max’s point of view, he hasn’t had to lock up, he hasn’t had to take massive avoiding action, I’m forever going to think that’s harsh until someone convinces me otherwise.”
Conclusion
The debate around Piastri’s penalty highlights the complexity of decision-making in Formula 1, where even minor infractions can have significant consequences. While some believe the penalty was justified, others argue that it was overly harsh, especially considering previous incidents that were treated differently. As the sport continues to evolve, such discussions will remain a key part of the conversation among fans, drivers, and pundits alike.
