The Backyard Go-Kart Track Dispute in Howard County
A long and intense hearing regarding a controversial backyard go-kart track in Howard County has concluded after more than 10 hours of testimony. The case, which involves a local father who built the track for his son, has sparked significant debate among residents and officials. The Board of Appeals is expected to issue its final decision on July 31.
Background of the Case
The hearing was a continuation of previous sessions that took place on June 5 and June 26. On June 5, the board made a unanimous decision that the go-kart track could be considered an athletic field, giving it jurisdiction over the case. This ruling allowed the proceedings to continue, leading to Thursday’s extended session.
Chris Siperko, the landowner, constructed the 1.5-mile asphalt track on his 11-acre property for his 11-year-old son, Achilles, who aspires to become a racecar driver. Siperko invested approximately $100,000 into the project but did so without obtaining permits from the county or the Maryland Department of the Environment.
Zoning Issues and Legal Proceedings
In January 2024, the Howard County Department of Planning and Zoning conducted an inspection of the site following complaints. They found that the track violated zoning and subdivision regulations. Siperko was issued a citation and paid a fine for grading without a permit. His attorney, Sang Oh, stated that he filed a conditional use application to address another citation.
In March, Howard County Hearing Examiner Katherine L. Taylor dismissed the case, citing a lack of jurisdiction. Siperko and his attorney appealed this decision, bringing the case before the Board of Appeals.
Conditional Use Plan and Environmental Concerns
The conditional use plan proposed by Siperko would involve moving a portion of the track to ensure a 100-foot buffer from neighboring properties. Robert Vogel, a civil engineer involved in the track’s design, testified that they would work with the Maryland Department of the Environment to restore any wetlands affected by the current track.
If approved, the conditional use would require a regulatory process, including the creation of a site development plan and an environmental concept plan, according to Oh.
Neighbor Concerns and Community Impact
Neighbors have expressed significant concerns about the potential impact of the go-kart track on their properties and the surrounding environment. Judy Radas, a neighbor, emphasized that while she admires a parent’s desire for their child’s success, it should not come at the expense of violating local codes and laws.
During the hearing, several neighbors voiced worries about environmental issues such as runoff from the track, microplastics from tires, and noise pollution. Some also expressed concerns about the potential decrease in property values and the precedent that might be set for other property owners if the appeal is granted.
Kelly Rudden, another neighbor, highlighted her concern about the noise from the track, which can be heard from her home office. She stated that while property owners have the right to use their land, this right should not infringe on others’ enjoyment of their own property.
Upcoming Verdict and Next Steps
The Board of Appeals will reconvene on July 31 at 9 a.m. to deliberate and issue its verdict. Both parties have the option to appeal the decision to the circuit court if necessary.
This case highlights the complex balance between personal aspirations and community well-being, as well as the importance of adhering to local regulations. As the board prepares to make its final decision, the outcome will likely have lasting implications for both Siperko and the neighborhood.
