Astrophysicist
Neil deGrasse Tyson
is raising concerns about
deep cuts to science
And regarding education funding, they described these cuts as being so detrimental that if they were imposed by another nation, it would be regarded as an act of hostility.
‘An Act of War’
“If a hostile nation secretly infiltrated our Federal budget and slashed funding for scientific research and education similar to how we’re reducing them ourselves—strategically eroding America’s future well-being, prosperity, and safety—we might view it as an act of warfare,” Tyson
posted
May 19 on X.
Don’t Miss:
Tolong support kita ya,
Cukup klik ini aja: https://indonesiacrowd.com/support-bonus/
-
Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers rely on this AI marketing agency —
Invest sooner rather than later.
-
‘Scrolling Toward UBI’ — The leading fast-rising software firm according to Deloitte lets individuals make cash through their mobile devices.
You can start investing today at only $0.30 per share with a minimum investment of $1000.
He also shared
Pablo Picasso’s
The artwork “Guernica,” a potent symbol against war, is used to reinforce the message.
Funding at Historic Lows
The New York Times
reported on Wednesday that the National Science Foundation is issuing new grants at the slowest rate in at least three and a half decades. By May 21st, the NSF had distributed $989 million in fresh grants for 2025—a 51% decrease compared to the $2 billion annual average observed from 2015 through 2024.
These reductions impact almost every area of science, not only the fields mentioned by the President.
Donald Trump’s
The administration has tagged as “woke.” As reported by The Times, NSF funding has decreased universally: physics grants have dropped by 85%, engineering by 57%, biology by 52%, and STEM education by 80%.
Hot Topic: Creator of the $60,000 folding house boasts 3 manufacturing facilities, over 600 homes constructed, and ambitious goals for addressing housing issues —
This is your final opportunity to invest at $0.80 per share.
Support Provided by the Military and Historical Background
Tyson kept pushing the matter on May 20.
writing
Not that anybody requested input, but throughout my term with the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board, which spanned some portion of Obama-2 and the entirety of Trump-1, we toured various military bases both within our country and overseas. During these visits, not once did any service member tell me: ‘The U.S. requires reduced funding for scientific research.’
He likewise spoke directly to Republicans in another segment.
post
Reducing scientific funding hasn’t typically been associated with Republicans. For instance, Abraham Lincoln established the National Academy of Sciences. Additionally, during Dwight D. Eisenhower’s tenure, the science budget was raised by 366%.
Gerald Ford
+15%;
George H W Bush
+30%;
George W Bush
+54%. Just sayin’.”
Specialists Sound Alarm Over Potential Long-Lasting Harm
The impact of the cuts is not just short-term. Experts warn they could severely damage the country’s future competitiveness.
Robert Atkinson
The president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation referred to the cuts as “the pinnacle of self-harm.”
“If they succeed in these cuts, the result will be slower economic growth, less innovation and new tech startups, and even more diminished competitiveness vis-à-vis China,” Atkinson told the Times.
See Also: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:
Invest in Cytonics and aid in disrupting a $390 billion stronghold of the pharmaceutical industry.
.
On the contrary, Representative
Zoe Lofgren
(D-CA) informed the Times that the administration is disregarding the intentions of Congress. “Their actions are not just unlawful, but they also cause significant harm to the scientific community and, in the end, to the U.S. economy.”
Tyson’s cautionary statement amplifies rising worries that the U.S. might be undermining its own prospects for the future.
Meanwhile, France and the European Union are implementing new measures.
$567 million plan
To draw in U.S. researchers impacted by budget reductions, President
Emmanuel Macron
and European Commission President
Ursula von der Leyen
suggest Europe aims to become a fresh haven for researchers confronting instability in the U.S.
“As Lofgren pointed out, you cannot have science without scientists.” Now, Tyson and others are posing the question: In the absence of adequate funding, who will remain to continue this legacy?
Read Next:
-
Join the next medical technology revolution for just $350 — over 500 procedures have been completed using nView’s artificial intelligence system.
-
Deloitte’s quickest-expanding software firm collaborates with Amazon, Walmart, and Target.
A lot of people are scrambling to purchase 4,000 of these pre-IPO shares at merely $0.30 per share!
Image: Shutterstock
© 2024 . Does not offer financial guidance. All rights reserved.
This article
Neil deGrasse Tyson states that reducing funding for science and education is so severe that if a foreign power were responsible, we would consider it “an act of war.”
originally appeared on
.
