(The Hill) – A second court determined that President Trump’s executive order regarding birthright citizenship remains unable to take effect anywhere in the country after the Supreme Court’s recent ruling thatclaws back nationwide injunctions.
The 9thUnited States Court of Appealsruled 2-1on Wednesday, it was stated that four states led by Democrats were eligible for a national injunction, as a more limited restriction would not offer them full remedy.
“Residents of states may deliver their babies in a state that is not a party to the agreement, and people affected by the Executive Order from non-party states will inevitably relocate to the States,” wrote U.S. Circuit Judge Ronald Gould.
Gould’s choice was supported by U.S. Circuit Judge Michael Hawkins, who was also appointed by former President Clinton.
U.S. Circuit Judge Patrick Bumatay, who was appointed by Trump, expressed disagreement, stating that the states did not have a legal basis to file the lawsuit.
“Courts need to remain alert in upholding the boundaries of our authority and our ability to mandate remedies,” Bumatay wrote.
Otherwise, we risk getting involved in disputes that aren’t within our jurisdiction and exceeding our authority,” he continued. “No matter how important the issue or how much is at stake in the case—always, we must stay within the limits of ‘the judicial Power.’
The decision follows theU.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 rulinglast week, restricted the power of federal judges to grant nationwide injunctions that extend beyond the parties involved in a lawsuit, preventing the president’s policies from being blocked for all citizens.
However, the Supreme Court maintained routes for plaintiffs to still obtain nationwide relief under specific conditions. People can initiate class-action lawsuits, and states might still be granted a nationwide injunction if it is necessary to provide them with full relief, the justices pointed out.
Since then, plaintiffs have taken both routes to stop Trump’s order, which would prevent individuals born in the country from obtaining citizenship unless at least one parent has permanent legal status. All courts that have addressed the issue have determined it to be unconstitutional.
The court’s decision on Wednesday marks the second instance where Trump’s order has been halted across the country after the Supreme Court’s ruling. A federal judge in New Hampshire approved the American Civil Liberties Union’s proposal to establish a nationwide class of unborn children andindefinitely block the administrationagainst enforcing Trump’s birthright citizenship order.
The 9thThe Circuit considered a case filed by Democratic attorneys general from Washington, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon. The majority of the panel stated on Wednesday that preventing Trump’s order from taking effect in certain areas of the country would continue to impose challenges on the four states.
“To address this, the States would have to completely reform their eligibility verification systems for Medicaid, CHIP, and Title IV-E. Because of this, the States would experience the same irreversible damages under a geographically restricted injunction as they would without any injunction,” Gould wrote.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This content cannot be published, aired, altered, or shared again.
