Legal Action Taken Against Real Estate Developer and Media Personality
A Lagos State High Court has issued an interim injunction to prevent real estate developer Kennedy Okonkwo, his company Capital Gardens Limited, and media personality Azuka Francisca Ogujiuba from publishing or republishing allegedly defamatory statements against Ikenna Jideofor and Adewale Oladapo. The decision was made by Justice Babatunde Sunmonu, who emphasized the need to protect the claimants’ reputations.
Support kami, ada hadiah spesial untuk anda.
Klik di sini: https://indonesiacrowd.com/support-bonus/
The court case was initiated by Ikenna Jideofor Ogbu and Premium Homes and Property Consultant Ltd, represented by their legal counsel, Adedayo Adedeji (SAN). The lawsuit was filed through an ex parte motion under Orders 42 and 43 of the Lagos State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019, as well as the Expeditious Disposal of Civil Cases Practice Direction No. 2 of 2019.
In the ruling delivered in suit no. LD/5250CMW/2025, Justice Sunmonu stated that the defendants, along with their agents, privies, or anyone acting on their behalf, are prohibited from publishing or causing to be republished the allegedly defamatory content against the claimants. The court highlighted the urgency of the matter, noting that without the injunction, irreparable harm could occur to the claimants’ reputations.
Key Details of the Defamatory Publications
The publications in question were dated May 23 and 28, 2025, and featured titles such as “Beware of Buying Hampton Estate from Ikenna Jideofor & Adewale Oladapo,” and “Beware: Ikenna Jideofor of Premium Homes and Adewale Oladapo of Oretol are hurriedly building on lands they do not own.” These statements were seen as damaging to the individuals named and raised concerns about their credibility in the real estate sector.
Support us — there's a special gift for you.
Click here: https://indonesiacrowd.com/support-bonus/
Justice Sunmonu emphasized that the injunction is necessary to prevent potential harm to the claimants’ reputation. He noted that if the relief was not granted, the damage caused could be difficult to reverse, and monetary compensation might not be sufficient to address the harm done.
Duration and Conditions of the Injunction
The interim order is valid for 14 days and is granted pending the defendants’ compliance with pre-action protocols, the filing of the substantive suit, and the hearing of any motion for interlocutory injunction. During this period, the defendants are also required to retract all defamatory posts made against the claimants on social media and electronic platforms, particularly those posted on the third defendant’s Instagram handle, @mediaroomhub.
Additionally, the court directed that the service of the interim orders must be carried out by publication in two widely circulated national newspapers and on all electronic and social media platforms where the defamatory statements were originally published. This ensures that the public is informed of the court’s decision and the restrictions placed on the defendants.
Implications of the Ruling
The court’s decision reflects the importance of protecting individuals from false and harmful statements that can damage their professional and personal reputations. It also highlights the role of the judiciary in ensuring that parties involved in disputes adhere to legal procedures and respect the rights of others.
This case serves as a reminder of the potential consequences of spreading unverified information, especially in the digital age where content can spread rapidly and reach a wide audience. The court’s actions aim to balance the right to free expression with the need to safeguard individuals from defamation.
The next steps in the case will involve the defendants complying with the court’s directives and preparing for the substantive hearing. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for similar disputes involving defamation and the use of social media in legal proceedings.
